Research Hypotheses
For the present study, we focus on three linguistic
areas in the naming of brands: phonetic / phonological
features, morphological/syntactic structures, and semantic
interpretations. We propose seven research hypotheses
based on a pilot study of sample Korean brand names
and on propositions that are believed to be governing
the area of Korean naming of brands:
H1 : There is a strong preference for multi-syllabic
brand names, preferably three or more syllables (tae-gum-san-dan-bi
'´ë±Ý»ê´Üºñ').
H2 : There is a strong preference for syllables without
coda; if there are codas, they are liquids or nasals
(l '¤©', n '¤¤', m '¤±', ng '¤·', swun-mae-sil '¼ø¸Å½Ç');
there is also a strong tendency to avoid consonant clusters.
H3 : there are few mono-morpheme brand names, and
the compounding structure follows the pattern of modifier-noun
(yeul-ryang-mil '¿·®¹Ð').
H4 : The compounding brand name has a positive connotation
(hae-co-mi-in 'ÇØÁ¶¹ÌÀÎ').
H5 : There is a semantic pattern that the substance
property of the brand is preceded by the function and
origin of the brand(sam-kang-hel-ssi-cin-dae-chwu '»ï°Çï¾¾Áø´ëÃß').
H6 : There is a recent trend that foreign-like brand
names are preferred (kul-ran-bi-a '±Û¶õºñ¾Æ').
H7 : there is a recent trend that phrasal brand names
are preferred (nae-chin-kwu-nun- swul-chin-kwu '³»Ä£±¸´Â
¼úÄ£±¸').
|